July 11, 2011 This Is For You, Bud
I have a bunch of friends. A satisfactory number, really. Without getting specific, it’s fair to say that there are a comforting number of people that I could count on in a time of arbitrary or magnified need.
As a general rule, friends support one another, as is our custom, for reasons that we don’t much care about. We tend not to question the motivation of our peers do-gooding because doing so either…
- awkwardly implies that our friends are friendly for non-altruistic, selfish reasons; or
- philosophizes our important relationships in such a horrifying, pedantic way that the analysis ends up undermining the goodness we started from
In any event, we all generally conclude that no matter what the reason — whether it be biological, environmental, social, or otherwise — the important thing is that we go out of our way to do kindness upon those who we’ve invested in socially.
We enjoy the acts of kindness that are bestowed upon us.
All hail kindness!
This is all pretty uncontroversial stuff.
Things get interesting, though, when our ability to accept kindness crumbles for reasons that I am not able to sufficiently explain.
Say, for example, that I have walked into a bar.
(I should have ducked!)
Next, let’s postulate that my plan is to meet some friends at this bar. Upon noting my arrival, any number of (reasonably kind) people would ask right away, “What do you want to drink?”
Why do my friends do this? It’s not because they are drunk (or even tipsy). It’s not even because they would like to see me drunk (or even tipsy). No. Presumably, they do this because that’s what friends do: We buy drinks for one another.
If I had no money and showed up at a bar to meet people, I would not be allowed to stand empty-handed, because of my friends, and I would do the same thing for them. But — and this is important — even if I had some dollars to spare, it is still socially acceptable for my friends to buy me a drink because — hey! — friendship!
All of this is still pretty uncontroversial, and that’s a good thing.
But here’s where it gets tricky: Let’s alter the situation. Let’s say that it’s noon-thirty on a Sunday afternoon, and I’m sitting in an apartment with one or two of those same friends from the bar on Saturday night.
“I’m hungry.”
“Great! Me, too.”
“What do you want for lunch?”
“Huh?”
“What do you want for lunch?”
“Huh? Why?”
“I’ll buy you a sandwich. Come on.”
“Why are you buying me lunch?”
“We’re friends, I don’t know. Let me buy you lunch.”
“Dude, weird. What’s going on?”
“Fine, I’ll buy you a beer.”
“Thanks, man!”
Keep in mind that these are the same people who, one night previous, were willing — unprovoked! — to spend much more than the cost of a sandwich to secure the other’s happiness. And yet here we have a case where a friend is trying to buy food — crucial for the maintenance of life and homeostasis — and the offer is being met with curiosity and skepticism.
Of course, the answer might be a simple “this is how we are socialized so just deal with it” or possibly “your friends obviously think you are trying to poison them,” but I think we ought to strongly consider being the people we when we are in bars all the time.
Without the drunk part.
(Most of the time.)
- 8 comments
- Posted under Consumption!, Society!
Permalink # Michael J. Levy said
Premeditation! That’s the difference, dear friend. Let’s alter the situation once more: You and this I are hungry and have decided to go to our favorite sandwichary. Now, as we get to the counter I cut in an declare that I am paying for both sandwiches. Significantly less weird! This situation, like buying a beer for a friend, is a spontaneous act, and that spontaneity is what keeps us from questioning our motivations and getting into that weird place.
Permalink # Zach S. said
Wouldn’t that still be weird, though? I would feel like I owed you a favor in the cut-in-line sandwichary situation, which is different from getting beerified. Although I guess my point is that neither situation should be considered “weird” because we should just be willing to be nice — and accept niceness. What if I cut in line to buy $10 worth of your groceries? What’s the difference there?
Permalink # Michael J. Levy said
I think the difference there is the ease of generosity. But I agree with you, we should all be more accepting of our friends nicenesses.
Permalink # Zach S. said
P.S. You should be blogging, lazyass.
Permalink # Michael J. Levy said
P.P.S. I’ve got a lot of sitting around to do, takes up most of my time.
Permalink # Stephen Vaughn said
At least in the example you provide, I think it’s about inclusion. At least to me it is. If I’m with several people at a bar and we all have a head start on you, then when you show up I’ll buy you a drink just as a way of saying “You may be late but you still belong. Welcome.”
If we show up at the same time, then I think it’s just a matter of efficiency. Buying drinks separately at the same time is cumbersome and time consuming. It just makes more sense to buy 1 round at a time.
Permalink # Allison Katz said
There is an element of generosity when buying a drink for a friend at the bar, however, you typically expect said friend to buy the next round. There is an immediate return on the kindness investment. If you see this person purchase a new drink and they don’t offer you one, you’re pissed off.
A sandwich situation is very different, as there is typically only one sandwich consumed per sitting so it is unknown when they will be able to hit you back. Plus, sobriety makes people mean.
Permalink # F.O.Y.E.R. 2011 « Faux Outrage said
[…] because I started out that month a weird love letter to freedom and a discussion about whether friendship means something different inside a bar than at a lunch counter (if those even exist anymore). Then I went on to discuss the strange […]